The authenticity of the given statement cannot be deduced. So, I does not follow. Since, the advertisement talks of quick returns, it implies that people want their money to grow, as an advertisement always imbibes comments and features that attract the attention of the people immediately. So, II follows.
Statements: Company X has a record of manufacturing cameras of quality and the latest design so that you do not spoil even a single shot irrespective of the weather conditions. Conclusions: I.No other company except X is reputed in the camera industry. II.Anyone can take an acceptable shot with camera X.
Clearly, the statement talks of Company X only and no other company. So, I does not follow. Also, it is mentioned that one can take a good shot even in bad weather conditions with a camera of Company X. So, II follows.
Statements: The XYZ Medical College has started a cell which will conduct counselling workshops in the field of stress management to patients and general public. Conclusions: I.The hospital has needed resources to start such activity. II.Patients and general public feel a need to have such cell in the hospital.
Since the hospital has started the activity, it must have been well-equipped for the same. So, I follows. Also, any new activity is started keeping in mind the need for it. So, II also follows.
Statements: India's economy is depending mainly on forests. Conclusions: I.Trees should be preserved to improve Indian economy. II.India wants only maintenance of forests to improve economic conditions.
It is mentioned in the statement that India's economy depends mainly on forests. This means that forests should be preserved. So, I follows. But, that only preservation of forests can improve the economy, cannot be said. So, II does not follow.
Answer & Explanation
View Answer
Workspace
Discussion
